Reflective Statement
<< back
to home
I have completed two and a half years as an assistant
professor in the Department of Childhood /Early Childhood
Education at SUNY Cortland. It has been 2.5 years of challenges,
excitement, hope, and change. I welcome this opportunity to
reflect on what I have learned and experienced in my two and
a half years and to summarize my growth as a professional.
Philosophy of Life
I believe that a complete
person is one who experiences life, learns to adapt, and
uses the lessons learned to improve the environment in which
(s)he operates. We are all lifelong learners, because the atmosphere
in which we live forces us to adjust to change and new situations.
Those of us who teach must inculcate in our students the
inspiration to continually adapt, grow, and learn.
I have personally
adapted to many changing environments and circumstances.
I grew up in China and had a successful teaching career in
that country. I married and raised a boy there and had a very
comfortable life as an Assistant Professor and later Associate
Professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. I was particularly
interested in language acquisition and the (still mysterious)
ways in which children learn the complexities of grammar, lexicon,
and syntax. Perhaps more than anything else, this unexplained
learning - which is peculiarly human - drew me to further
explorations and inquiries into the mystery of human learning.
Is there a Language Acquisition Device (LAD) imprinted into
our DNA, or are there situational phenomena that explain how
all sentient humans acquire the ability to form and understand
an infinite number of wellformed sentences? How is that humans
learn?
I spent five years pursuing a PhD in Educational Technology
(at the time, this was a branch of Educational Psychology
at MSU) in Michigan State University. The move was not an easy
one: there were linguistic, cultural, and climaterelated
challenges that tested my resolve and sometimes left me in
doubt of my strength. But I continued to learn, to adapt, and
to use the new experiences and lessons to further my understanding
and development. I learned to drive, to build web pages, to
"hang out" with fellow graduate students. And I learned
that some human qualities are universal: love, kindness, the
desire for improvement, the need for fellowship. I also learned
that some nonuniversal qualities - freedom, respect for diversity,
and collaboration - are worthwhile and even precious. Struggling
with snow, language barriers, and cultural differences, I
discovered my own individuality and sense of worth.
I'm nowhere
near what I hope to be, but I'm learning and adapting every
day. The lessons I have learned are deeper, perhaps, than
those of many others in my program, and yet they are part of
the fabric of human existence: we are the species that adapts,
organizes, and ultimately prevails because of our ability
to learn. I'm a teacher again now, and that's a noble and
vital thing for any human to be.
back to top
Reflections on Teaching
In the two and a half years, I have taught
in the undergraduate childhood education program and
the MSED in Childhood Education graduate program at SUNY Cortland.
The technology course (EDU314: Teaching
with Computers in Elementary and Middle Schools) is
designed to provide preservice teachers with introductory
skills aimed at helping them to integrate technology into
their future teaching. The educational research methods course
(EDU651:
Understanding and Conducting Educational Research) is
intended to provide graduate students with basic understandings
of research, information, and methodology to be applied throughout
the Master's program. I have designed each course to be rigorous
and to have clearly delineated learning outcomes.
My teaching
effectiveness is partially reflected in the course teacher
evaluation (CTE) scores, along with students' reactions and
comments, students' individual growth, and my personal devotion
to the development of the courses.
Of the sixteen classes I taught during the two and a half
years, the overall adjusted mean of CTE scores averaged 4.2
out of a possible 5.0, with the lowest score of 3.6 (first
semester) and the highest 4.8. A pattern of continuous improvement
of my teaching is reflected from the increase of the CTE:
the last semester fall 2007 the CTE of each of the four classes
went above 4.0, ranging from 4.2 to 4.6 (view
students evaluation and comments from
each individual class here). The improvement of my teaching
is also reflected in students reactions and comments, students'
individual growth, and my increased confidence.
Worth
to mention is my undertaking of all the four computer technology
classes EDU314 during the 2007 fall semester to help
the Department handle with the shortage of instructors for
the technology classes due to the abrupt departure of another
faculty member very close to the begining of the new semester.
There were many challenges teaching four classes
of this two-credit hour course with a four-day
teaching schedule. Despite the many challenges
I was successful in gaining excellent learning
results with these four classes. I received very positive feedback
from students in all four classes (CTE 4.2 to 4.6). Although
this hectic pace will continue for another semester, I am pleased
that I can help the Department through this turbulent period.
My technology
course (EDU314) in all five semesters received very positive
comments. Students commented that this was a course in which
they learned and mastered the most competencies. Students'
growth is always individual, but the scope and quality of their
course projects is an indicator of high achievement (view an
example of students projects here).
Students in the technology classes had a good mastery of both
basic and advanced technology skills, and were able to recognize
multiple ways to integrate technology into their curriculum.
This was especially gratifying since many of these students
came to the class with limited computer literacy. The first
two semesters the educational research methods classes (EDU651)
had diverse comments on both the teaching and learning. Some
were very positive and some reflected difficulties with the
course. The last semester the research method course received
unaminous positive comments (view students comments from spring
2007 here). The subject matter
- learning to design a research study and compose a research
proposal is challenging to everyone, including our master students.
I set high standards and expectations for students, and gave
very rigorous evaluations of both their learning progress and
learning outcomes. "She definitely made me work hard!", one
student commented. Their research proposals were impressive,
and some could be sent for conference presentations or be developed
into research papers for publication.
I continue to develop
and redesign my courses in an effort to maximize learner
engagement. My proposal "Teaching Innovation Reforming
the Teaching of Technology to Preservice Teachers" with
Cynthia Saver (another new faculty member in the Adolescent
Department) is part of that effort. I have also benefited from
very positive feedback by experts in the field and from colleagues
in the College who came to team teach or to observe my teaching,
including Dr. Lin Lin (View Letter in
HTML), Dr. Susan Stratton (View
Letter in HTML),
Dr. Margaret Richardson (View
Letter in JPEG)
and Dr. Cynthia Benton (View Letter in JPEG).
I want each of my students to
surpass their own expectations as learners. To accomplish this,
I heap praise and encouragement on those who do commendable
work and encourage all students to set challenging goals for
themselves. Just as I am prompt in the provision of feedback
on their assignments, I expect my students to be prompt in
their completion of assignments. I let them know how much time
they should expect to spend preparing for class and working
on assignments, and I explain clearly the consequences of nonattendance.
Because my goal is to ensure that students perform well, every
semester I reconsider my course designs even though I taugh
the same courses in order to optimally challenge the students.
As an instructor I "practice what I
preach."
I feel a responsibility to model for my students that kind
of behavior and attitudes I hope they will develop: respect
for diversity, eagerness to learn, high expectations, and willingness
to collaborate. My students' reactions consistently cite my
variety of teaching techniques, organization, and passion for
the subject matter. They also recognize my hard work and personal
kindness, which seems to me a reinforcement of the kind of
atmosphere I hope to maintain in my classroom. I hope these
qualities which they see in me will be contagious: that my
students will "catch" the "fever" for learning
that I have and apply themselves with the same level of commitment
and passion.
back to top
Reflections on Scholarship
One of the most satisfying experiences of this past two and
a half years has been my scholarly activity. I have presented
or been invited to present twelve (13) papers at
national and international conferences, including The League
for Innovation's annual Conference on Information Technology
(CIT), the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association (AERA), the Annual conference of the Society for
Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE), the Annual
Conference of the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE),
the National Conference on Research in Language and Literacy
(NCRLL), the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning,
and the Annual Syllabus Conference for Educational Technology
(Campus Technology).
Five (5) of my papers during the past two and a half years
were published and another two (2) were submitted and under review.
The paper Thread
Theory: A Framework Applied to Content Analysis of Synchronous
Computer Mediated Communication Data was published (March,
2006) by the International Journal of Instructional Technology
and Distance Learning (ITDL). The editor praised this line
of research as "landmark" research. The paper Finding
the Right Tools: A Study of eConferencing in Higher Education was
published by EDUCAUSE Quarterly (Vol.29, No.4,
2006) and was an "an excellent addition to the literature
of our profession" (words of editor of EDUCAUSE).
I have received seven (7) internal grants during the
past two and a half years: Research Enhancement and Development
Initiatives (REDI), Faculty Research Program (FRP),
Teaching Innovation Grants (TIG) (with Cynthia Saver) from
Faculty Development Center, Dean's Grant from School of Education,
Individual Development Award (IDA), a NYS/UUP Joint LaborManagement
Program from Professional Development Campus Committee (PDC),
and Research Travel Grants.
My research concerns several
themes. The first line of my research is the identification
of best teaching practices using econferencing. I am the Principle
Investigator for the California Educational Technology Collaborative
(CETC) (I have included A Letter of
Appreciation (in JPEG) from
this organization), and have been investigating the use of
synchronous online teaching tools made available to 110 colleges
through a statewide grant program, CCC Confer (www.cccconfer.org).
The preliminary results of this investigation was published
in Educause Quarterly November 2006 and presented at the
2006 Conference on Information Technology hosted by the League
for Innovation. By focusing on the use of econferencing tools
to accomplish specific pedagogical purposes, this research
promises to improve professional development for online educators
and clarify the effective use of synchronous online technology.
The CETC had also solicited my counsel for a podcasting research
proposal, which had been submitted to the Carnegie Corporation
and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for funding. It has been
an extraordinary experience to conduct research with professionals
on both coasts, and I have learned a great deal
from this opportunity.
The second line is preservice teacher professional
development. With the leadership of Dr. Beth Klein, I and another
new faculty member Dr. HeeYoung Kim are collaboratively conducting
research on the effect of implementing an integrated technologybased
project on the growth of preservice teachers. The preliminary
results of this research were copresented at the 2006 annual conference
of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education
(SITE) and published in the proceedings of the conference. We are currently completing an indepth
data analysis and preparing a manuscript for publication. The
targeted journal is Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
Education (CITE).
Related to this second line of research is my collaborative
research with Dr. Susan Stratton, Dr. Kim Rombach, Karen Hempson, and other
faculty in thematic Block I on the development of two preliminary models -
Education for Social Transformation (e4st), a thematic block that touches
on the method course content and teamteaching initiatives; and Threading Technology Throughout the Curriculum (T3C), a thematic block that focuses on the thoughtful integration of contemporary
technology applications into the subject areas of math, science, and social
studies and literacy.
The purpose of this research is to develop ways to facilitate
our college students' growth in understanding the multifaceted
ways that they need to be prepared to teach diverse students
in their future classrooms through partnership with urban schools
whose inservice teachers and students will simultaneously
benefit from the partnership. This line of collaborative research was presented at the 2007 annual conference
of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education
(SITE) and published in the proceedings of the conference.
The third line of my research is technology integration:
reforming the teaching of technology to preservice teachers.
I have redesigned my own course EDU314 Teaching with Computers
in Elementary and Middle Schools because I am committed
to ensuring that the technical skills taught in the course
are not merely applied by preservice teachers but delivered
in such a way as to provide teacher candidates with the conceptual
framework for using them to enhance student learning in their
respective disciplines. This commitment was funded by an Individual
Development Award (IDA). I am also conducting a joint
study with another new faculty Dr. Cynthia Saver. The study
aimed to provide a model for integrating technology and course
content in teacher education programs at SUNY Cortland, one
that may also be adopted by other institutions of higher education.
By working together, Dr. Sarver and I appreciated and
embodied the goals of this project: integrated, meaningful technology
use for education. The joint research was funded by a Teaching
Innovation Grant.
The fourth line of my research is on podcasting: Best Practices in Podcasting. Formed research team. Research plans in progress.
The fifth line of my research is Thread Theory. Thread Theory research is now the major line and focus of my research. I devised Thread Theory as a theoretical framework to evaluate the effectiveness of online teaching as it was introduced. Thread Theory received support from several grants on the way of its development:
Spencer Fellowship (Research Training Grant 2003-2004) from the Spencer Foundation & Michigan State University ($12,000); Faculty Research Program (FRP), an internal grant from SUNY Cortland and the Dean's Grant. Each grant helped move the project a step further. Its extradionary accountability in the past and the potential of securing external grants won the Thread Theory project
the 2008-2009 Research Enrichment & Development Initiative (REDI) Fellowship Program.
Proposed research includes developing, applying and field-testing an innovative and original theory that suggests and explores potentially transformative concepts. The study comprises a large-scale empirical effort in addressing gaps in the current knowledge of the conceptual and analytical framework needed to analyze and identify what makes quality/effective synchronous online interaction.
The research will create an avenue for discussions of best online teaching practices.
My long-term goal is to establish a Cortland
Center for Synchronous Learning (C2SL). The center will be a home for both synchronous online learning/training and research. View my five year research plan for this line of research in PDF
back to top
Reflections on Service
Service has been an important part of establishing myself as a faculty member at Cortland and a member of a larger community. I have participated in, and am currently serving as, a member of various committees on the departmental level, school level, college level and SUNY system state level, national and international level, . For instance, in Department level, I served in the Research and Technology CommitteeI and a Generalist Search Committee; in College level, I served in the Director of International Programs Search Committee; on State level, I serve in the University Faculty Senate,
Graduate and Research Committee; on national and international level, I have made regular editorial services and membership affiliations. I see service as a way of both enhancing one's learning and developing a sense of civic pride and values. I enjoy having positive working relationships with my colleagues and thereby being able to collaborate at all levels.
back to top
My Goals as a Teacher, Researcher, and Community
Member
I believe that it is essential
to have professional goals that I strive to attain throughout
my career as a professor, researcher and community member.
I believe teaching and research goes hand in
hand. My research questions originated from my learning and
teaching experiences and my learning and teaching experiences
inform new research questions. I will constantly use my
research findings to improve my instructional practices,
while concurrently reflecting on how my classroom practices
can inform my research. The ultimate goal of research is to
create the most optimal learning environment and increase student
learning outcomes.
The development of Thread Theory,
along with the reaction to this conceptual framework by peers
and experts in the field, has been exciting and promises to
open many opportunities for research and theory. I hope to
pursue this vigorously by securing an external (NSF) grant to fund
further research along this line.
My work with the California Educational Technology Collaborative
has also been a unique and extraordinary opportunity. The model
for econferencing support which California has developed -
centralized funding, grantbased technical support, and collaborative
promotion throughout the state - has potential for application
in several other states, including New York. I hope to pursue
prospects for applying this model in the SUNY system and/or
in community colleges in New York State. Working collaboratively
with California educators and professionals may provide opportunities
for national or multistate funding and costsavings, and has
the potential to enhance both systems (SUNY and CETC).
My longterm goal is to establish a Cortland
Center for Synchronous Learning (C2SL). This center will be the home for learning/training and research in the area of synchronous online instruction providing
instruction, support, and research into the effective use of
synchronous conferencing and instructional tools. Online instruction and distance learning are
expanding in this country, and the use of synchronous online
tools provides for more interaction, more content, and more
engagement. The C2SL will specifically focus on the use of
synchronous online tools to facilitate instruction and learning.
<< back to top
<< back
to home
|